Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

From: Gunnar Rønning <gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com>
To: <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
Date: 2001-10-21 03:24:33
Message-ID: m2bsj1n09a.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches

* "Dave Cramer" <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> wrote:
|
|
| There seems to be enough interested parties to support both build tools.
| For the folks that want a Makefile, they can support it. If someone
| wants to support the build.xml file, then we should encourage it. I
| suspect that one of them will become obsolete on it's own.

I think that would be the best as well for time being. Don't remove ant
support as that is very useful for the people working on the JDBC code, and
add standard make files for building the system. Make itself is not designed
to work with a language like Java, so you need third party tools to handle
dependencies.

Gunnar

--
Gunnar Rønning - gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rene Pijlman 2001-10-21 12:04:31 Re: PreparedStatement parameters question
Previous Message Thomas O'Dowd 2001-10-21 02:37:29 Re: Does PG's JDBC support prepared statements at all?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rene Pijlman 2001-10-21 12:06:21 Re: Does PG's JDBC support prepared statements at all?
Previous Message Thomas O'Dowd 2001-10-21 02:37:29 Re: Does PG's JDBC support prepared statements at all?