| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Extreme bloating of intarray GiST indexes |
| Date: | 2011-04-29 18:50:38 |
| Message-ID: | m2aaf828ox.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Uh, no, the picksplit bugs we fixed were in cube and seg --- there's
> no reason to think that updating will help this. But 8.4's pgstattuple
> does appear to support gist indexes, so please run that and see what
> you get.
There's also gevel that I used to inspect in development GiST index, and
I found it pretty useful. Don't know yet how it compares to pgstattuple.
http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/wiki/Gevel
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-04-29 18:56:18 | EXPLAIN Node Docs? |
| Previous Message | ktm@rice.edu | 2011-04-29 18:17:22 | Re: Changing the continuation-line prompt in psql? |