Re: Finer Extension dependencies

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Finer Extension dependencies
Date: 2012-04-05 16:58:55
Message-ID: m2aa2qt8s0.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Examining this thread, I think there is insufficient consensus to push
> this patch into 9.2. It's not entirely clear that this patch isn't
> what we want, but it's not entirely clear that it is what we want
> either, and I think it's too late in the release cycle to push
> anything into the release that we're not fairly sure we actually want,
> because there won't be time to revisit that decision before this ends
> up out in the wild. It's also not the sort of thing we can just whack
> around in the next release if we get it wrong, because APIs for coping
> with versioning are exactly the kind of thing that you can't go change
> at the drop of a hat. I'm therefore marking this Returned with
> Feedback.

Fair enough I guess. The first extension patch took me more than 2
years∫of brewing before we get to a consensus on what we wanted in core,
I shouldn't have assumed it would ease the path for next improvements
too much.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-04-05 16:59:59 Re: patch: improve SLRU replacement algorithm
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2012-04-05 16:58:33 Re: pg_upgrade improvements