Re: How could we make it simple to access the log as a table?

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How could we make it simple to access the log as a table?
Date: 2012-05-28 15:39:41
Message-ID: m28vgciabm.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> This is really where I was hoping to eventually get to with the logging
> changes that have been discussed over the past couple of years. We need
> to have a mechanism to allow logging to different places, based on
> information included in the log message and/or context, where one of
> those places could potentially be some kind of receiver process that
> then dumps the message into a table, either on the local system or on a
> remote system.

That looks like syslog features?

> What exactly all of that looks like and how it works is a pretty big
> discussion, but I'd definitely love to hear from others who are
> interested in changes to our logging infrastructure.

I though about exposing the log CSV files as partitions of a log table,
each partition being a FDW able to read the file.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2012-05-28 15:57:32 Re: How could we make it simple to access the log as a table?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-05-28 15:16:24 Re: Backends stalled in 'startup' state: index corruption