| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: machine-parseable object descriptions |
| Date: | 2013-03-20 10:32:23 |
| Message-ID: | m27gl2745k.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> All in all, I'm happy with this and I'm considering committing it as
> soon as we agree on the set of columns. I'm mildly on the side of
> removing the separate schema column and keeping name, so we'd have
> type/name/identity.
I would prefer that we keep the schema column, for easier per-schema
processing or filtering. It's way eaiser to provide it in a separate
column than to ask people to parse it back from the identity column.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ants Aasma | 2013-03-20 11:01:28 | Re: Enabling Checksums |
| Previous Message | Ants Aasma | 2013-03-20 10:31:10 | Re: Enabling Checksums |