| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Postgres - Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: set GUC variables for single query |
| Date: | 2011-10-16 18:49:33 |
| Message-ID: | m24nz8hiv6.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> writes:
> this idea has cropped up last PGCon - the ability to set GUC variables
> for the duration of a single query. It would work by setting the GUCs
> for the duration of the query and setting them back to what they were
> after it has terminated. By "setting them back" I mean respecting the
> previously set values, regardless of their source (set in run-time,
> per-role settings, postgresql.conf settings).
+1 on the use case, allowing to do that in the statement itself would be
a nice convenience.
> It mostly falls into the realm of syntax sugar, but as more than one
> person felt it's a good idea, I thought I'd float it around here.
>
> I poked a little bit at the grammar to see where could it fit and didn't
> have much success of doing it without a new reserved keyword. Supposing
> the idea gets some traction, any suggestions for the syntax?
I think it would fit quite well within our extending of the WITH syntax.
WITH
work_mem = '1GB',
timezone = 'Europe/Amsterdam',
foo AS (
SELECT something
)
SELECT toplevel FROM foo;
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-16 20:00:30 | Re: (patch) regression diffs on collate.linux.utf8 test |
| Previous Message | Florian Pflug | 2011-10-16 18:36:36 | Re: Underspecified window queries in regression tests |