From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.3 Beta 1 Coming Soon! |
Date: | 2013-04-16 08:31:17 |
Message-ID: | m24nf6vpuy.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 15 April 2013 23:23, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> * declarative matviews
>> * event triggers
>
> Regrettably the state of both of those features is nowhere near
> complete enough for wide production use. Highlighting them as tier 1
> items would be misleading. If there is a way to say these are good
> steps towards the full feature set people expect then it will work.
> Initial, basic, entry level etc.. (Note that I'm not commenting on the
> internal implementation, just the user facing feature set).
Yes, please don't mention Event Triggers anywhere. You can not solve a
single problem with them that you couldn't already solve before with a
hook, and you need to be using C to access any interesting data.
As a user, Event Triggers just don't exist in 9.3, full stop.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2013-04-16 08:36:48 | Re: Speaking of event triggers ... |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2013-04-16 08:29:32 | Re: 9.3 Beta 1 Coming Soon! |