| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Where to load modules from? |
| Date: | 2013-09-15 16:51:26 |
| Message-ID: | m24n9mf2pd.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Post it to the pgsql-hackers list.
Well. I think I just did ;-)
> I understand why using the commit fest process is attractive for this,
> because it enables you to force the issue. But the point of the commit
It enables me to have a slight chance of seeing the effort happen within
the current release development time frame, 9.4. The next commit fest is
going to happen in november, if I don't have code to submit at this time
the next release will still have no solution to offer.
> fest is to highlight patches whose discussion has mostly concluded and
> get them committed. If we add general discussion to the commit fest,
> it'll just become a mirror of the mailing list, and then we'll need yet
> another level of process to isolate the ready patches from that.
Well, even with what I said before, you're completely right in this
phrasing of the situation, so I've just removed my two entries with no
patch from the current CF.
With some luck I will be able to revive the discussions and reach some
consensus in time to have code written for the Open CF 2013-11.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine 06 63 07 10 78
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2013-09-15 16:52:48 | Re: PL Code Archive Proposal |
| Previous Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2013-09-15 16:27:49 | Re: [PATCH] pg_upgrade: Split off pg_fatal() from pg_log() |