| From: | Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: New Contrib Build? |
| Date: | 2005-05-12 12:22:20 |
| Message-ID: | m23bss7hxf.fsf@Douglas-McNaughts-Powerbook.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I suppose the question is, at what point are contrib modules
> re-reviewed for inclusion into core? And if they are continuing not
> to make it, is there something else that should be done with them?
Basically, if someone wants a contrib module in core, they should step
up, discuss on -hackers what needs to be done to make it core-ready,
and submit patches for review. That's how all PG development works. :)
-Doug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Cave-Ayland | 2005-05-12 12:48:48 | Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations |
| Previous Message | Andrew - Supernews | 2005-05-12 09:43:15 | Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1 |