| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: wCTE behaviour |
| Date: | 2010-11-13 19:12:55 |
| Message-ID: | m239r5t4ug.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> It's not that straighforward though, in that the producer could stop a
> bit ahead of what the consumer reads, due to there being a buffer in the
> middle. Witness this simple example
Yeah, another example where the analogy fails for us.
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-11-13 20:13:17 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2010-11-13 18:46:46 | Re: wCTE behaviour |