Re: pg_dump with postgis extension dumps rules separately

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump with postgis extension dumps rules separately
Date: 2013-05-30 09:02:17
Message-ID: m238t4263q.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Here's a cleaned up version, which also includes documentation. I'll
> commit back to 9.1 in a day or two unless there are any objections.

Looks good to me.

Were you able to test it against an extension containing both rules and
views, to check that pg_dump has no problem with the new set of
dependencies?

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-05-30 10:49:42 Re: fallocate / posix_fallocate for new WAL file creation (etc...)
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-05-30 08:32:58 Re: Eliminating PD_ALL_VISIBLE, take 2