Re: INET/CIDR types

From: darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain)
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org, Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Subject: Re: INET/CIDR types
Date: 2000-07-24 20:53:24
Message-ID: m13GpE4-000AX0C@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thus spake Larry Rosenman
> What RFC says you can't print all 4 octets of a CIDR Netnumber?

Can't recall. It was Paul Vixie who made the claim and since he was
probably the one who wrote it I tend to believe him.

In fact it may be that it suggested rather than required but someone
would have to dig out the RFC before we considered changing it I think.

> Why does network(cidr) return the whole cidr output just like
> select cidr?

Yah, it's redundant. "network(cidr)" is just a long way to say "cidr."
The only reason it is there is because of the way the code was written
for the two types. Not having it would have required a special test to
look for it and technically it is correct so we didn't bother.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2000-07-24 21:11:34 RE: INET/CIDR types
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2000-07-24 20:27:24 RE: INET/CIDR types