| From: | darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain) |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL GENERAL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Revised Copyright: is this more palatable?? |
| Date: | 2000-07-05 12:02:09 |
| Message-ID: | m139nsX-000AXmC@druid.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Thus spake Jan Wieck
> Right. Someone who doesn't want to make his code "FREE" in
> the entire meaning of this word but want to make it open for
> any non-commercial use should choose it. IMHO the GPL
While I am a proponent of keeping the BSD style license, there is nothing
in the GPL about using code for commercial use one way or the other.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-07-05 12:11:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Revised Copyright: is this morepalatable? |
| Previous Message | eisentrp | 2000-07-05 11:48:39 | Re: createlang and PGLIB (was Re: [GENERAL] sequential test error) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-07-05 12:11:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Revised Copyright: is this morepalatable? |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-07-05 11:54:35 | Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres |