From: | wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) |
Cc: | kaiq(at)realtyideas(dot)com, pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, wieck(at)debis(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] avg() on numeric ? |
Date: | 1999-12-17 23:43:51 |
Message-ID: | m11z72N-0003kKC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
>
> <kaiq(at)realtyideas(dot)com> writes:
> > test=> select avg(quota) from salesreps;
> > ERROR: overflow on numeric ABS(value) >= 10^-1 for field with precision 0 scale 1723
>
> > test=> select avg(sales) from salesreps;
> > ERROR: overflow on numeric ABS(value) >= 10^-1 for field with precision 0
> > scale 1723
>
> Hmm ... there were some similar bugs reported a couple of months ago,
> and I thought Jan would've fixed them by now. Jan, if you don't have
> time to look at this, let me know and I'll see if I can do anything
> with it.
Looks to me there's something wrong with the adjustment of
actual computation and/or display precision during longer
taking aggregates. I know where to look at - tnx anyway.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-12-18 00:32:05 | Re: [SQL] Sub-select speed. |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-12-17 23:25:01 | Re: [SQL] Sub-select speed. |