Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock

From: wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk
Cc: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, wieck(at)debis(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock
Date: 1999-12-17 23:41:31
Message-ID: m11z707-0003kKC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Keith Parks wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I reduced the tests to just 2 parallel, varchar and text.
> (These 2 did seem to fail regularly)

That's interesting! So it's something likely to be
reproduceable. Very good.

But anyway - is it an older or a new bug? I'll try to use the
parallel test on a 6.5.* release the next days - maybe it
tells us something more.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-12-18 00:28:57 Re: [HACKERS] psql/sql_help.h
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-12-17 23:39:21 Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock