From: | wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
To: | emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk |
Cc: | pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, wieck(at)debis(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock |
Date: | 1999-12-17 23:41:31 |
Message-ID: | m11z707-0003kKC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Keith Parks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I reduced the tests to just 2 parallel, varchar and text.
> (These 2 did seem to fail regularly)
That's interesting! So it's something likely to be
reproduceable. Very good.
But anyway - is it an older or a new bug? I'll try to use the
parallel test on a 6.5.* release the next days - maybe it
tells us something more.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-12-18 00:28:57 | Re: [HACKERS] psql/sql_help.h |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-12-17 23:39:21 | Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock |