Re: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA

From: wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane)
Cc: wieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA
Date: 1999-12-13 04:04:44
Message-ID: m11xMj6-0003kGC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane asked:

> (Jan, do you really think you can make this happen *and* bring foreign
> keys to a finished status before February? If you are going to leave
> stuff undone in foreign keys, I think you are making the wrong choice.)

Except for the file buffering of the trigger event queue,
FOREIGN KEY is completely implemented as I proposed, MATCH
FULL.

Thus I HAVE the time.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-12-13 04:12:19 Re: [HACKERS] LONG
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1999-12-13 03:58:00 update_pg_pwd