From: | "D'Arcy" "J(dot)M(dot)" Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | hannu(at)tm(dot)ee (Hannu Krosing) |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release |
Date: | 1999-12-11 12:48:43 |
Message-ID: | m11wlx5-0000dTC@druid.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thus spake Hannu Krosing
> "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" wrote:
> > Any chance of getting the FK semantics into the parser right away even
> > though it is ignored?
>
> We do have foreign key syntax in parser
>
> hannu=> create table foreign_tab(
> hannu-> f int,
> hannu-> foreign key(f) references primary_tab (i)
> hannu-> );
> NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/FOREIGN KEY clause ignored; not yet implemented
>
> What do you mean by semantics here ?
> Should it check that the primary table and field(s) exist ?
Nope. That's exactly what I meant. I didn't realize that it was already
there. Sorry for the confusion.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-12-11 13:28:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-12-11 12:48:19 | Re: [HACKERS] LONG |