From: | wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
To: | jose(at)sferacarta(dot)com (jose soares) |
Cc: | wieck(at)debis(dot)com, bruce(at)cenderis(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] NULL |
Date: | 1999-11-17 18:31:28 |
Message-ID: | m11o9rc-0003kGC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
> Jan Wieck ha scritto:
>
> > > - Is it a constraint to allow only NULL values ? (unuseful)
> >
> > Useless? I NEED IT - URGENT - NOW - YESTERDAY.
>
> Maybe I miss something here, Jan...
Yepp - my smiley on the last line.
It wasn't a serious comment. More a joke and I really mean
that such a definition is absolutely not needed. Maybe I'm
writing too much between the lines.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gerhard Dieringer | 1999-11-18 08:01:11 | Antw: [SQL] Building "ON DELETE" rules to keep the referential integrity of a database |
Previous Message | jose soares | 1999-11-17 13:56:16 | Re: [SQL] NULL |