Re: [SQL] NULL

From: wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: jose(at)sferacarta(dot)com (jose soares)
Cc: wieck(at)debis(dot)com, bruce(at)cenderis(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] NULL
Date: 1999-11-17 18:31:28
Message-ID: m11o9rc-0003kGC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

> Jan Wieck ha scritto:
>
> > > - Is it a constraint to allow only NULL values ? (unuseful)
> >
> > Useless? I NEED IT - URGENT - NOW - YESTERDAY.
>
> Maybe I miss something here, Jan...

Yepp - my smiley on the last line.

It wasn't a serious comment. More a joke and I really mean
that such a definition is absolutely not needed. Maybe I'm
writing too much between the lines.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gerhard Dieringer 1999-11-18 08:01:11 Antw: [SQL] Building "ON DELETE" rules to keep the referential integrity of a database
Previous Message jose soares 1999-11-17 13:56:16 Re: [SQL] NULL