Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2

>
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Removed manually. Thanks. I have been far behind in keeping up with
> > > patches.
> >
> > Looks like :)
> >
> > Well, actually running regression test emits alot of
> >
> > NOTICE: Auto-creating query reference to table <table-name>
> >
> > from inside the parser - which make most of the regression
> > tests fail. Not sure which of the patches introduced them
> > and why. Could you please take a look at it? On the things
> > I'm doing right now (adding fields + indices to system
> > catalogs and modifying code that's invoked during heap_open()
> > or the like) I feel much better if I get identical (+
> > correct) regression results before'n'after.
>
> I have backed this change out. I will re-enable it when things are
> quiet and the regression tests can be re-generated.

[pgsql(at)hot] ~/devel/src/test/regress > ./checkresults
====== int2 ======
10c10
< ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Numerical result out of range
---
> ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Math result not representable
====== int4 ======
10c10
< ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "1000000000000": Numerical result out of range
---
> ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "1000000000000": Math result not representable
[pgsql(at)hot] ~/devel/src/test/regress >

Such a regression result while we're in the middle of feature
development.

I'm really impressed - if we only can keep it on this level!

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #