From: | wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
To: | maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) |
Cc: | wieck(at)debis(dot)com, lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Compile timing |
Date: | 1999-09-23 07:51:08 |
Message-ID: | m11U3em-0003kLC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> With parallelization, using gmake -j2, I got:
>
> real 3m8.980s
> user 2m23.442s
> sys 0m36.142s
>
> Not sure why -j2 is not faster than normal -j, unless gmake knows to use
> -j2 on a 2-cpu system by default. Looking at the xps output, I don't
> see multiple compiles being performed by gmake.
Because it hasn't prallelized :-)
The -j2 wasn't handed down to the submakes and I'm sure
there's only one started from the top.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Grzegorz Przeździecki | 1999-09-23 08:05:15 | Problem with new function |
Previous Message | Adriaan Joubert | 1999-09-23 07:45:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Operator definitions |