Re: [GENERAL] Large database

From: jim(at)reptiles(dot)org (Jim Mercer)
To: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: jim(at)reptiles(dot)org, gjerde(at)icebox(dot)org, gd(at)pinmail(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Large database
Date: 1999-08-17 17:16:50
Message-ID: m11Gmqw-00080YC@mailbox.reptiles.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> > it would be nice if vacuum could figure out if an extent is no longer
> > in use, and delete it.
> >
> > currently, we need to dump the table, then nuke it and restore it.
>
> We tried removing the extra extent, but the other backends needed it
> around because there was no way to tell them that the extra extent file
> descriptor was useless. You could just stop the postmaster, and delete
> the zero-length extents, if you really wanted to. Do the extra extent
> files cause problems for you? If so, we can start to look at some
> postmaster cleanup of those.

i haven't actually seen the system reduce a numbered extent.

i could be wrong.

--
[ Jim Mercer Reptilian Research jim(at)reptiles(dot)org +1 416 410-5633 ]
[ The telephone, for those of you who have forgotten, was a commonly used ]
[ communications technology in the days before electronic mail. ]
[ They're still easy to find in most large cities. -- Nathaniel Borenstein ]

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-08-17 17:19:52 Re: [GENERAL] Large database
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-08-17 17:03:54 Re: [GENERAL] Large database