Re: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0

>
> Can I have votes on what people want the next version number to be?
>
> We have to brand the release when we start development(PG_VERSION file).
> 6.5 probably should have been called 7.0, but we had already committed
> to 6.5.

Now seriously:

Naming it 7.0 IMHO requires transaction log, tuple split over
blocks, foreign keys, outer joins and rules of arbitrary
size. I don't expect ALL of them for the next release, so let
it be 6.6.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #