Re: [HACKERS] Arbitrary tuple size

From: wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Arbitrary tuple size
Date: 1999-07-09 08:27:49
Message-ID: m112W0b-0003kiC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii wrote:

>
> Going toward >8k tuples would be really good, but I suspect we may
> some difficulties with LO stuffs once we implement it. Also it seems
> that it's not worth to adapt LOs with newly designed tuples. I think
> the design of current LOs are so broken that we need to redesign them.
>
> [... LO stuff deleted ...]

I wasn't talking about a new datatype that can exceed the
tuple limit. The general tuple split I want will also handle
it if a row with 40 text attributes of each 1K gets stored.
That's something different.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1999-07-09 09:19:53 Re: [HACKERS] Arbitrary tuple size
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 1999-07-09 07:58:52 Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO list