From: | wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (PostgreSQL HACKERS) |
Subject: | "24" < INT_MIN returns TRUE ??? |
Date: | 1999-07-08 16:14:02 |
Message-ID: | m112GoE-0003ktC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
did anyone compile latest CVS with v1.31
utils/adt/numutils.c?
Marc activated some range checks in pg_atoi() and now I have
a very interesting behaviour on a Linux box running gcc 2.8.1
glibc-2.
Inside of pg_atoi(), the value is read into a long. Comparing
a small positive long like 24 against INT_MIN returns TRUE -
dunno how. Putting INT_MIN into another long variable and
comparing the two returns the expected FALSE - so what's
going on here? long, int32 and int have all 4 bytes here.
Someone any clue?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#========================================= wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-07-08 16:18:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Arbitrary tuple size |
Previous Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 1999-07-08 16:06:43 | CVS broken |