Re: [HACKERS] Postgres mailing lists

From: "D'Arcy" "J(dot)M(dot)" Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
To: chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com (Chris Bitmead)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Postgres mailing lists
Date: 1999-06-16 12:00:55
Message-ID: m10uEND-0000d2C@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports pgsql-sql

Thus spake Chris Bitmead
> Is it really necessary that the mailing lists block "non-member
> submissions"?. I have several email addresses and this is rather
> inconvenient.

Spam is inconvenient. The term for mailing lists that don't do this
sort of blocking is "spam amplifier."

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-06-16 13:03:46 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.0 - Overflow bug in AVG( )
Previous Message Thomas Good 1999-06-16 11:37:05 Re: [HACKERS] Linux Documentation Project

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-06-16 13:19:01 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres mailing lists
Previous Message Vincenzo de Sortis 1999-06-16 11:45:07

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-06-16 13:19:01 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres mailing lists
Previous Message Remigiusz Sokolowski 1999-06-16 11:46:45 Re: [SQL] converting from number to text