Re: [HACKERS] "DML"

From: "D'Arcy" "J(dot)M(dot)" Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
To: tomg(at)nrnet(dot)org (Thomas Good)
Cc: dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com, lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu, vadim(at)krs(dot)ru, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] "DML"
Date: 1999-06-12 02:34:46
Message-ID: m10sdd8-0000d2C@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thus spake Thomas Good
> I'm not sure why they originally split up SQL but I know this:

Actually, I think it was the other way around. The term SQL didn't
come into use until DDL, DML and DCL had been in common use. I'm
pretty sure Date didn't mention SQL in his original paper.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 1999-06-12 02:56:18 Re: [HACKERS] "DML"
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 1999-06-12 01:51:58 BUG: ERROR: regcomp failed with error empty (sub)expression