Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump

From: wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com (Chris Bitmead)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump
Date: 1999-06-01 12:20:35
Message-ID: m10onX1-0003kbC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chris Bitmead wrote:

>
>
> I'm convinced that pg_dump / psql restore doesn't seem to restore VIEWs
> properly. Anybody else seen this?

More details please!

There must be something wrong in the rule utilities when
backparsing the views CREATE RULE statement. I need the
definition of the view, the underlying tables and the
(schema) output of pg_dump to track it down.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

  • pg_dump at 1999-06-01 11:13:13 from Chris Bitmead

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Bitmead 1999-06-01 12:37:13 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump
Previous Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 1999-06-01 12:10:58 Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype