| From: | wieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
|---|---|
| To: | chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com (Chris Bitmead) |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump |
| Date: | 1999-06-01 12:20:35 |
| Message-ID: | m10onX1-0003kbC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Chris Bitmead wrote:
>
>
> I'm convinced that pg_dump / psql restore doesn't seem to restore VIEWs
> properly. Anybody else seen this?
More details please!
There must be something wrong in the rule utilities when
backparsing the views CREATE RULE statement. I need the
definition of the view, the underlying tables and the
(schema) output of pg_dump to track it down.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Bitmead | 1999-06-01 12:37:13 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump |
| Previous Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 1999-06-01 12:10:58 | Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype |