From: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
To: | Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at (ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5) |
Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: AW: [HACKERS] create index updates nrows statistics |
Date: | 1999-05-26 07:43:29 |
Message-ID: | m10mYLZ-000EBPC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> > > a create index updates the statistics in pg_class,
> > > this leads to substantial performance degradation compared to
> > > 6.4.2.
> >
> > Create index did that in 6.4.2 as well --- how could it be making
> > performance worse?
> >
> I am not sure why, but in 6.4.2 a create table, create index, insert,
> select * from tab where indexedcol=5 did actually use the index path,
> even if table reltuples and relpages was 0.
> It currently uses a seq scan, which is exactly what we wanted to avoid
> in the newly created table case, but do want on an actually small table.
>
> Please apply the patch I previously sent.
From memory not verified:
Doesn't CREATE INDEX update pg_statistics? I think it does so
the faked statistics only cause different joins to happen as
long as there is no index created immediately after CREATE
TABLE (HASHJOIN vs. NESTLOOP).
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5 | 1999-05-26 07:58:44 | AW: AW: [HACKERS] create index updates nrows statistics |
Previous Message | ZEUGSWETTER Andreas IZ5 | 1999-05-26 07:28:07 | AW: [HACKERS] create index updates nrows statistics |