From: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) |
Cc: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] INSERT INTO view means what exactly? |
Date: | 1999-05-25 19:22:51 |
Message-ID: | m10mMmp-000EBPC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> regression=> INSERT INTO z VALUES ('bar');
> >> INSERT 411636 1
> >>
> >> OK, where'd tuple 411636 go?
>
> > Tuple 411636 went into data/base/regression/x :-)
>
> .../z, you meant --- yup, I see you are right. Weird. I didn't
> realize that views had an underlying table.
They ARE a table - only that a rule ON SELECT hides their
(normal) emptyness :-)
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Sauer | 1999-05-25 19:48:23 | I can't compile cvs snapshot ... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-05-25 19:16:50 | Re: [HACKERS] strange behavior of UPDATE |