From: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
To: | tveith(at)heaven(dot)oeh(dot)univie(dot)ac(dot)at |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] PL/pgsql questions.. |
Date: | 1999-04-26 07:31:19 |
Message-ID: | m10bfrL-000EBZC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Thomas Veith wrote:
>
> One thing which I think is really important is PL/pgsql.. I carefully read
> the bit of information which is available, but thats not very much..
Tnx
>
> I have 2 questions.. first, can you point me to some information about
> this topic which i maybe have missed?
Maybe you missed the docs in the programmers manual?
>
> second, take this procedure from an informix database:
>
> [...]
>
> so my question is, does PG/plsql support this, if so how, and if not, is
> it planned to be supported in the near future?
Functions in procedural languages (PL/Tcl, PL/pgSQL) inherit
the same restrictions C language functions have in
PostgreSQL. One of them I hate most is that they cannot
return set results. Thus "RETURN ... AND RESUME" is
currently not supported. It requires major changes to the
function manager and executor.
The time I expect it is not that near in future I would like
it.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | José Soares | 1999-04-26 12:44:14 | Re: [SQL] Primary Key Bugs |
Previous Message | Tim Perdue | 1999-04-25 17:59:53 | Primary Key Bugs |