| From: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
|---|---|
| To: | maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) |
| Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: map |
| Date: | 1999-03-10 20:50:33 |
| Message-ID: | m10Kpw1-000EBSC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> > Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > >> background is not white --- there's a white ring around each
> > >> continent thanks to poor antialiasing.
> >
> > > We force a cream background for that page, no?
> >
> > It's gray on my browser (Netscape 4.0something). Even if it were
> > cream, the background of the gif is *white* not cream, so the ring
> > would still be there (maybe a little harder to see though).
> >
> > Since GIF hasn't got partial transparency, you can't do real
> > antialiasing without making the background colors match.
> > You're probably best off not using transparency at all, unless
> > you forget about antialiasing. (Or is it antialiasing that's
> > leaving the near-white pixels there? Maybe it's just sloppy drawing
> > of the border of the transparent region?)
>
> I am confused. I don't even know what anti-aliasing is. Nor do I
> understand why you get a grey background. I am running Netscape 4.5,
> and I see the background of all the pages as off-white.
If the <BODY> doesn't define a background, Netscape uses it's
(configurable) default one. So your config say's white (why
not slategray?).
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-03-10 20:51:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-03-10 20:48:04 | Re: [HACKERS] Developers globe |