| From: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
|---|---|
| To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) |
| Cc: | maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: map |
| Date: | 1999-03-10 20:33:50 |
| Message-ID: | m10Kpfq-000EBSC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> background is not white --- there's a white ring around each
> >> continent thanks to poor antialiasing.
>
> > We force a cream background for that page, no?
>
> It's gray on my browser (Netscape 4.0something). Even if it were
> cream, the background of the gif is *white* not cream, so the ring
> would still be there (maybe a little harder to see though).
>
> Since GIF hasn't got partial transparency, you can't do real
> antialiasing without making the background colors match.
> You're probably best off not using transparency at all, unless
> you forget about antialiasing. (Or is it antialiasing that's
> leaving the near-white pixels there? Maybe it's just sloppy drawing
> of the border of the transparent region?)
Did you take a look at my one? It's using transparency too,
but since I created the image by program, there are only 4
colors at all (plus tranparent). Has it noise too or is it
O.K.?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-03-10 20:45:53 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: map |
| Previous Message | Jackson, DeJuan | 1999-03-10 20:18:15 | RE: [HACKERS] Bug on complex subselect (was: Bug on complex join) |