| From: | jim(at)reptiles(dot)org (Jim Mercer) |
|---|---|
| To: | vadim(at)krs(dot)ru (Vadim Mikheev) |
| Cc: | jim(at)reptiles(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] slow inserts and updates on large tables |
| Date: | 1999-02-17 05:10:18 |
| Message-ID: | m10CzFa-00080dC@mailbox.reptiles.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> > if 100 inserts/second and 40 updates/second is all i can realistically
> > expect, then i will have to investigate alternate databases (likely
> > commercial ones like Progress on SCO, yech!).
> >
> > if anyone has any pointers as to why this is so slow, lemme know.
>
> What's -B ?
it is whatever the default is.
> Do you use BEGIN/END to run _many_ updates/inserts in
> _single_ transaction ?
i tried that and it didn't seem to make much difference.
--
[ Jim Mercer Reptilian Research jim(at)reptiles(dot)org +1 416 410-5633 ]
[ The telephone, for those of you who have forgotten, was a commonly used ]
[ communications technology in the days before electronic mail. ]
[ They're still easy to find in most large cities. -- Nathaniel Borenstein ]
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Herouth Maoz | 1999-02-17 09:18:50 | Re: [GENERAL] slow inserts and updates on large tables |
| Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1999-02-17 03:27:49 | Re: [GENERAL] slow inserts and updates on large tables |