NUMERIC stuff committed

From: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu, jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: NUMERIC stuff committed
Date: 1998-12-30 20:29:13
Message-ID: m0zvSF0-000EBPC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

> [...]
> oids into that range, while we have never used oids over 1644. Just
> start at 1650 and head toward 16384. We have roughly 16200 unused
> system oids left.

I've just committed the NUMERIC stuff to the CURRENT tree.
Used OID's 1700-1767 up to now (some more will follow when
implementing the trigonometric functions).

Well folks - it's there now and can be stressed! Don't forget
to initdb.

I'll add a first precision check using some of the complex
math functions with scale 1000 to the regression soon.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Terry Mackintosh 1998-12-31 00:09:48 psql: stdout or stderr?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-12-30 16:53:08 Re: [HACKERS] NUMERIC needs OID's