From: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org (PostgreSQL HACKERS) |
Subject: | COMMIT |
Date: | 1998-11-30 16:38:00 |
Message-ID: | m0zkWKn-000EBjC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
while on the redolog, I've came across a little detail I'm in
doubt about. Currently it seems, that the 'C' response to the
frontend is sent before the transaction get's really
committed in the backend. So there is a little chance that
the backend dies between this response and the
CommitTransaction() call.
Isn't that the wrong order? As a programmer I would assume,
that if I have positive response to COMMIT, I can forget my
local data because it made it safely into the database.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Henry B. Hotz | 1998-11-30 17:53:28 | Re: [HACKERS] Testing, Hello? |
Previous Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-11-30 16:28:08 | Re: [HACKERS] sbufdesc' padding... |