Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2 ...

From: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (Marc G(dot) Fournier)
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v6.4 BETA2 ...
Date: 1998-10-14 21:06:19
Message-ID: m0zTY7f-000EBRC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> > >
> > >
> > > I just built and regression tested the current source tree on both Solaris
> > > x86 and Solaris Sparc, and other then a few bugs that I've fixed, it was
> > > smooth...
> > >
> > > Any arguments against getting a BETA2 out tomorrow afternoon?
> >
> > Have a crashing backend after a huge transaction on the next
> > insert into a table with indices. Crash is reproducable and
> > seems to be due to a corrupted index file.
> >
> > Recompiling with COPT=-g now...
>
> I saw Bruce's last on this...will wait until you guys have this
> sorted out before I build the snapshot...
>

Was my fault - not a bug.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Massimo Dal Zotto 1998-10-14 21:08:24 sgml
Previous Message Jan Wieck 1998-10-14 21:05:07 Re: [HACKERS] What about LIMIT in SELECT ?