| From: | darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain) |
|---|---|
| To: | darcy(at)druid(dot)net (darcy) |
| Cc: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Permissions not working? |
| Date: | 1998-10-13 17:13:02 |
| Message-ID: | m0zT80M-0000emC@druid.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thus spake darcy
> > Here I assume user darcy has usesuper set in pg_shadow. Check
> > and correct me if I'm wrong. The superuser flag is set if you
> > allow darcy to create users on createuser time.
>
> Correct again. I half suspected something like this. Perhaps the
> prompt in createuser should be changed to reflect that the user is
> being granted full superuser privileges rather than just being able
> to create more users.
Should I send in the (trivial) diffs to effect this change? I figure
to ask the following.
"Does user "x" have superuser privileges? (y/n)"
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 1998-10-13 17:31:51 | What about LIMIT in SELECT ? |
| Previous Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 1998-10-13 16:58:03 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: inet/cidr/bind |