Re: [HACKERS] Re: hackers-digest V1 #954

From: darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain)
To: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (The Hermit Hacker)
Cc: paul(at)vix(dot)com (Paul A Vixie), pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: hackers-digest V1 #954
Date: 1998-09-04 18:43:18
Message-ID: m0zF0pK-00006JC@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thus spake The Hermit Hacker
> I would like to see the cidr type for v6.4 myself...and believe
> Bruce was willing to do the actual integration work, if we had the code
> for it...how long would it take to have code ready to be integrated, that
> would give us a base to build from?

There was a lot of discussion about what types there should be and what
functions should operate on them. Why not do the documentation first?
Once the documentation has been debugged, the code itself should be
relatively painless. We'll use the documentation as a spec.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Zeugswetter 1998-09-04 19:10:52 Open portability issues
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-09-04 18:40:14 Re: [HACKERS] Re: CIDR/IP types. Was: [GENERAL] big numbers