Re: [HACKERS] dumping rules

From: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] dumping rules
Date: 1998-08-18 20:18:51
Message-ID: m0z8sDU-000EBPC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> Jan,
>
> I'm absolutely amazed by this piece of magic.

Written just to check if I understand parsetrees now.

:-)

> A simple VIEW I have goes in as:-
>
> SELECT t.artist, t.song, t.trackno, d.cdname
> FROM disks d, tracks t
> WHERE d.diskid = t.diskid
>
> And comes out as :-
>
> disks=> select get_ruledef('_RETsongs');
> get_ruledef
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> CREATE RULE _RETsongs AS ON SELECT TO songs DO INSTEAD SELECT t.artist, t.song,
> t.trackno, d.cdname FROM disks d, tracks t WHERE d.diskid = t.diskid;
> (1 row)
>
> disks=>
>
> Absolutely perfect rule definition for the VIEW.
>
> One slight bug I found was that ANDs come out as ORs but that's
> easily fixed with the following patch.

cut-n-paste error, tnx.

Another one might be ISNULL (I think I missed it). But as I said,
it's just a point to start from.

>
> What can I say.....
> Thanks,
> Keith.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-08-18 21:26:53 Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results!
Previous Message Keith Parks 1998-08-18 20:07:17 Re: [HACKERS] dumping rules