Re: [HACKERS] Table permissions problem

From: darcy(at)druid(dot)net (D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain)
To: maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Table permissions problem
Date: 1998-08-13 12:35:35
Message-ID: m0z6wbP-00006FC@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thus spake Bruce Momjian
> > Hmm. That makes it difficult. I would like to build databases from
> > scripts. I guess I can build them as the super user.
> >
> > Shouldn't the database owner have more privs then someone using the
> > database? Is that what that TODO item is actually suggesting?
>
> Remember some tables are shared with all databases. Makes things more
> difficult.

I didn't realize that. I assume that you don't mean some system tables
as they could, I am sure, be special cased. Can you expand? I once
had a situation where a table in one database was trashed by being filled
with data from another table of the same name in another database. Was
I bitten by this feature somehow? At the same time I like the idea of
sharing tables. It would be perfect for things like time zone and
province/state tables.

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-08-13 12:53:15 Re: [HACKERS] Latest ecpg patch?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-08-13 12:22:57 Re: [HACKERS] tuple return from function