Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL - for discussion (RETURN)

From: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck)
To: djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com (Jackson, DeJuan)
Cc: jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, andreas(dot)zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL - for discussion (RETURN)
Date: 1998-03-13 16:55:26
Message-ID: m0yDXjz-000BFRC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> But what about Triggers?!.
> DEJ

That's a completely different call interface. They return
a HeapTuple that can be a modified one or just NULL to skip
the whole action. But first I run for functions, then for
triggers.

Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#======================================== jwieck(at)debis(dot)com (Jan Wieck) #

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Phan 1998-03-13 17:07:40 Postgresql v6.3 for Alpha Digital Unix
Previous Message David Phan 1998-03-13 16:54:36 Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL - for discussion