From: | Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Work table |
Date: | 2013-10-27 20:34:04 |
Message-ID: | l4jtav$etv$1@ger.gmane.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Robert James wrote on 27.10.2013 20:47:
> I'm using Postgres for data analysis (interactive and batch). I need
> to focus the analysis on a subset of one table, and, for both
> performance and simplicity, have a function which loads that subset
> into another table (DELETE FROM another_table; INSERT INTO
> another_table SELECT ...).
>
> Oddly enough, although the SELECT itself is very quick (< 1 s), the
> DELETE and INSERT can take over a minute! I can't figure out why.
> another_table is simple: it has only 7 fields. Two of those fields
> are indexed, using a simple one field standard index. There are no
> triggers on it.
>
> What is the cause of this behavior? What should I do to make this
> faster? Is there a recommended work around?
>
> (I'm hesitant to drop another_table and recreate it each time, since
> many views depend on it.)
DELETE can be a quite lengthy thing to do - especially with a large number of rows.
If you use TRUNCATE instead, this will be *much* quicker with the additional benefit,
that if you INSERT the rows in the same transaction, the INSERT will require much less
I/O because it's not logged.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert James | 2013-10-27 21:23:35 | Re: Work table |
Previous Message | Robert James | 2013-10-27 19:47:16 | Work table |