Re: Performance Enhancement/Fix for Array Utility Functions

From: Mike Lewis <mikelikespie(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance Enhancement/Fix for Array Utility Functions
Date: 2010-03-31 09:08:22
Message-ID: l2t948ce0b71003310208p10a87732h33f196687b1473f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Woops. I sent the wrong patch. My apologies. Attached is the real
patch. Sorry, also forgot this is made against 9.0 alpha 4 tag.

Thanks,
Mike

--
Michael Lewis
lolrus.org
mikelikespie(at)gmail(dot)com

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Mike Lewis <mikelikespie(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I noticed while doing work with very large arrays that several
> functions such as array_length detoast the entire array instead of
> only what is required.
>
> I found the solution to be just unpacking the header portion of the
> array and ignoring the rest.  Since the header (including the
> dimensions) is variable length, I just unpack the size of what the
> header would be if it had MAXDIM dimensions. (Patch is attached)
>
> I made a test case to demonstrate performance gains (watch out, it
> creates a big table):
>
> create temporary table foo as
>        select array_agg(i) as a
>        from (
>                select generate_series(1,10000000) as i) as bar;
> \timing
> select array_length(a, 1) from foo; -- Run a few times.  First time will be cold
>
> Results (after warming up)
>
> Before patch:
> Time: 6.251 ms
> Time: 6.078 ms
> Time: 5.983 ms
>
> After patch:
> Time: 0.401 ms
> Time: 0.397 ms
> Time: 0.441 ms
> ...
>
> --
> Michael Lewis
> lolrus.org
> mikelikespie(at)gmail(dot)com
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
detoast-headers-for-array-functions-002.patch application/octet-stream 3.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-03-31 09:58:57 Re: pending patch: Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-03-31 09:02:47 Re: pending patch: Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown