Re: Connection Pooling

From: Halil Türker Özdamar <halil(dot)turker(dot)ozdamar(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Wappler, Robert" <rwappler(at)ophardt(dot)com>
Cc: David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Connection Pooling
Date: 2010-04-04 18:33:34
Message-ID: l2sc71407981004041133t6852c5eds470a08694ed3a917@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

We are using proxool for many deployments, we were using DBCP but proxool is
better in terms of features.

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Wappler, Robert <rwappler(at)ophardt(dot)com>wrote:

> On 2010-03-29, David Kerr wrote:
>
> > On 3/27/2010 12:46 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> >> Allan Kamau wrote:
> >>> You may also have a look at Commons DBCP from Apache software
> >>> foundation, "http://commons.apache.org/dbcp/". I have used it for a
> >>> few projects and have had no problems.
> >>
> >> for that matter, JDBC has its own connection pooling in java.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > It looks like both of those solutions require a coding change. I'm
> > hoping for a middleware solution similar to pgpool/pgbouncer.
> >
>
> I'm using proxool for JDBC-connection pooling. It behaves as a usual
> JDBC-Driver or DataSource should do. The configuration can be loaded
> statically when starting the application.
>
> --
> Robert...
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Björn Lindqvist 2010-04-04 20:14:07 Completely wrong row estimates
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-04-04 16:36:23 Re: How to configure the postmaster daemon so that it accepts TCP connections?