From: | Halil Türker Özdamar <halil(dot)turker(dot)ozdamar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Wappler, Robert" <rwappler(at)ophardt(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Connection Pooling |
Date: | 2010-04-04 18:33:34 |
Message-ID: | l2sc71407981004041133t6852c5eds470a08694ed3a917@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
We are using proxool for many deployments, we were using DBCP but proxool is
better in terms of features.
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Wappler, Robert <rwappler(at)ophardt(dot)com>wrote:
> On 2010-03-29, David Kerr wrote:
>
> > On 3/27/2010 12:46 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> >> Allan Kamau wrote:
> >>> You may also have a look at Commons DBCP from Apache software
> >>> foundation, "http://commons.apache.org/dbcp/". I have used it for a
> >>> few projects and have had no problems.
> >>
> >> for that matter, JDBC has its own connection pooling in java.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > It looks like both of those solutions require a coding change. I'm
> > hoping for a middleware solution similar to pgpool/pgbouncer.
> >
>
> I'm using proxool for JDBC-connection pooling. It behaves as a usual
> JDBC-Driver or DataSource should do. The configuration can be loaded
> statically when starting the application.
>
> --
> Robert...
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Björn Lindqvist | 2010-04-04 20:14:07 | Completely wrong row estimates |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-04 16:36:23 | Re: How to configure the postmaster daemon so that it accepts TCP connections? |