On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> OK, that looks a lot less risky than I had understood from discussions.
> The main thing for me is it doesn't interfere with Startup or
> WalReceiver, so assuming it works I've got no objections. Thanks for
> chasing this down, good addition.
Thanks. Committed.
...Robert