Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL

From: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL
Date: 2013-09-13 16:27:27
Message-ID: l0ved5$7tf$1@ger.gmane.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Patrick Dung wrote on 13.09.2013 18:17:
> The problem of pg_upgrade is that it needed to hold two set of databases data in the server.
> This is not be desirable (very slow) or possible (space limitation) for database with huge data.
>
> For example, if the old version is already using over 50% of the mount point.
> The new database may not have enough disk space for the upgrading.

I think if you use the --link parameter, you don't need additional disk space (or only little).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2013-09-13 16:29:14 Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL
Previous Message Patrick Dung 2013-09-13 16:17:13 Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL