| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Kuzmenkov <akuzmenkov(at)timescale(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Incorrect result of bitmap heap scan. |
| Date: | 2025-03-17 17:18:55 |
| Message-ID: | ksu5dtbmpvdolwuu2ubq745qbvg4mk2jpwu527autrftpsm6im@lifqp5icoyyi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2025-03-17 16:17:03 +0100, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> As I understand it, Andres agrees that the feature is unsalvageable in
> backbranches ("don't think there's a realistic way to fix it"). Andres
> then continues to elaborate that even if the feature were salvageable,
> it wouldn't contain much of the current code.
Correct.
> My patch removes the feature altogether in master and disables the
> feature in the backbranches in the patches that were built against the
> backbranches, which seems to match Andres' comments.
Agreed.
> @vignesh, could you elaborate on what about Andres' comments I need to
> address in my patch?
I don't think there are any...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2025-03-17 17:20:22 | Re: pgsql: pg_upgrade: Preserve default char signedness value from old clus |
| Previous Message | Daniil Davydov | 2025-03-17 17:04:15 | Re: Forbid to DROP temp tables of other sessions |