| From: | Mark Morgan Lloyd <markMLl(dot)pgsql-general(at)telemetry(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)PostgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | PL/R etc. |
| Date: | 2013-05-10 09:41:47 |
| Message-ID: | kmifcs$lcg$1@pye-srv-01.telemetry.co.uk |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I don't know whether anybody active on the list has R (and in particular
PL/R) experience, but just in case... :-)
i) Something like APL can operate on an array with minimal regard for
index order, i.e. operations across the array are as easily-expressed
and as efficient as operations down the array. Does this apply to PL/R?
ii) Things like OpenOffice can be very inefficient if operating over a
table comprising a non-trivial number of rows. Does PL/R offer a
significant improvement, e.g. by using a cursor rather than trying to
read an entire resultset into memory?
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Misa Simic | 2013-05-10 10:24:46 | Re: Storing small image files |
| Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2013-05-10 08:11:35 | Re: Storing small image files |