Re: which slony to start?

If it's "not production," (and I understand all the nuances of "sort of production") why not just 9.3 both of them and use built-in replication? What are you trying to accomplish that you feel Slony will do better?

<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: wambacher <wnordmann(at)gmx(dot)de> </div><div>Date:06/04/2014 3:24 PM (GMT-06:00) </div><div>To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org </div><div>Subject: [ADMIN] which slony to start? </div><div>
</div>Hi

i'm plannig to use Slony to do some replication between 2 Ubuntu-Systems
running postgresql 9.1 and 9.3.

reading this page http://slony.info/ i'm a little bit confused which
slony-version would be the best to start with.

2.2.2 , 2.1.4 or 2.0.8?

It's a production system but not for commercial (critical) use. Just an
OpenStreetmap database of ~600GB

regards
walter

--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/which-slony-to-start-tp5806072.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - admin mailing list archive at Nabble.com.