From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements |
Date: | 2010-04-02 06:06:04 |
Message-ID: | k2i3f0b79eb1004012306xdfa88c1cudd77b61368c997ea@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> It's probably also easy to fix so that it doesn't NEED to be documented.
>
> The thing is, when dealing with new features, we reduce our overall
> maintenance burden if we get it right the first time. Obviously it's
> too late for major changes, but minor adjustments to maintain the POLA
> seem like exactly what we SHOULD be doing right now.
The attached patch implements the Heikki's proposal:
----------
ReservedBackends = superuser_reserved_connections + max_wal_senders
MaxBackends = max_connections + autovacuum_max_workers + max_wal_senders + 1
----------
This change looks like minor adjustments rather than major changes.
I have one question:
In the patch, max_wal_senders is ignored by CheckRequiredParameterValues()
as autovacuum_max_workers is already. Is this OK for HS?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
replication_connections_v1.patch | application/octet-stream | 9.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2010-04-02 06:20:32 | PDF build issue with 9.0 Alpha5 |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-04-01 22:55:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-04-02 06:28:44 | Re: Compile fail, alpha5 & gcc 4.3.3 in elog.c |
Previous Message | Takahiro Itagaki | 2010-04-02 05:47:30 | Re: Problem of Magic Block in Postgres 8.2 |